Optimal capital structure, ambiguity aversion, and leverage puzzles

نویسندگان

چکیده

We introduce ambiguity about the asset value dynamics of a firm into trade-off framework capital structure. characterize investors’ preferences by recursive multiple priors utility. show that equity holders’ aversion significantly reduces optimal leverage and debt capacity. In particular, holders with sufficiently strong perceive their to be “too valuable lose” upon bankruptcy therefore optimally choose zero forgo tax benefits avoid possible default. also distortion effect on choice is stronger (weaker) when firm’s markets are segmented (integrated).

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Miller's Equilibrium, Shareholder Leverage Clienteles, and Optimal Capital Structure

Miller's Equilibrium, Shareholder Leverage Clienteles, and Optimal Capital Structure Author(s): E. Han Kim Source: The Journal of Finance, Vol. 37, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the American Finance Association, Washington, D.C., December 28-30, 1981 (May, 1982), pp. 301-319 Published by: Blackwell Publishing for the American Finance Association Stable URL: htt...

متن کامل

Ambiguity aversion and household portfolio choice puzzles: Empirical evidence.

We test the relation between ambiguity aversion and five household portfolio choice puzzles: nonparticipation in equities, low allocations to equity, home-bias, own-company stock ownership, and portfolio under-diversification. In a representative US household survey, we measure ambiguity preferences using custom-designed questions based on Ellsberg urns. As theory predicts, ambiguity aversion i...

متن کامل

Ambiguity and Ambiguity Aversion

Consider the following choice problem, known as “Ellsberg’s three-color urn example”, or simply the “Ellsberg Paradox” (Ellsberg [7]). An urn contains 30 red balls, and 60 green and blue balls, in unspecified proportions; subjects are asked to compare (i) a bet on a red draw vs. a bet on a green draw, and (ii) a bet on a red or blue draw vs. a bet on a green or blue draw. If the subject wins a ...

متن کامل

Distortion risk measures, ambiguity aversion and optimal effort

We consider the class of concave distortion risk measures to study how choice is influenced by the decision-maker’s attitude to risk and provide comparative static results. We also assume ambiguity about the probability distribution of the risk and consider a framework à la Klibanoff, Marinacci, and Mukerji (2005) to study the value of information that resolves ambiguity. We show that this valu...

متن کامل

Hypothesis Testing and Ambiguity Aversion∗

We study a model of non-Bayesian updating, based on the Hypothesis Testing model of Ortoleva (2012), for ambiguity averse agents. Agents ranks acts following the MaxMin Expected Utility model of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989) and when they receive new information they update their set of priors as follows: If the information is such that all priors in the original set of priors assign to it a pro...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1879-1743', '0165-1889']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104176